Didn’t Solve World Hunger Again Today
Catherine Morely.Passion doesn’t have to be raving or manic. The British, or in this case, Irish manifestation can be quite calm, even a little reserved. But you recognize it right away. Oxford scholar Catherine Morley cares immensely about a subject most people don’t give a rip about - modern American literature, sees it as full of meaning and, for her, it’s an answer to the existential question, “What’s the point anyway?”
When we met Catherine, she had just delivered a paper titled ‘Willa Cather: American Modernist?’ at the Willa Cather Foundation’s Annual Conference in Red Cloud, and she was staying on a few days to do some research in the Cather archives there for her upcoming book.
Catherine is charming, laughs easily, is wonderfully knowledgeable about modern American “literature”, and she is, as the British say approvingly, “a bit mad”.
How else could she have written a thesis named The Quest for Epic in Contemporary American Fiction: John Updike, Philip Roth and Don DeLillo’? Seems ripe for satire, but we refrain because, when you talk with Catherine, her career choice makes sense. We talked into the evening about English/American literature in general and Willa Cather in particular. I listened and learned. I was taught.
But I didn’t ask her the question that was foremost in my mind: “Shouldn’t a woman of your education and ability really be solving world hunger or something?”
It’s a question that dogs me. When it comes right down to it, I get joy from art that’s pulled off successfully. It’s the solace of my life, and I care about it more than anything else (hyperbole warning). Art museums and libraries don’t bore me, I get stimulated and I make connections and the world gets more understandable.
And, not to put too fine a point on it, watching Laurel and Hardy trying to move that piano across the footbridge over a ravine in Switzerland when, for no reason, a gorilla starts to cross from the other side…that's also art, comic art of the first order. Just thinking about that silliest predicament of all time makes me laugh. No spotlight can be too bright for those two guys. They pulled it off – just like Willa Cather and Jack Kerouac and Paul Strand and any other dead guys I’ve been writing about lately. I want to say, “Hey, look: joy and character and friends forever, and they made the world laugh its head off.” That’s Art with a capital T, folks.
Or that movie where Charlie Chaplin falls in love with the blind flower girl -- I mean – that’s it. The end. Art gets no better. It cannot. That final scene is up there with the end of La Boheme as a defining moment in the western love story. To get back to Catherine Morley, who I very much admire, I could easily spend the rest of my life pointing at the wonderful artists, both high culture and pop culture, who have been swept into the corner by time, and saying, “Hey, over here, look at this – joy and character and you’ll laugh your head off”. It's not that different than Catherine’s career plan, although she practices at Oxford, and I practice at McDonald's in Pismo Beach, California. (where I sit writing and posting this screed)
Yet there’s all this important work to be done. It really can’t wait. Little babies are dying because there are germs in their drinking water. Innocent little girls are being sold into sex slavery at this very moment. And the ice caps are melting, just like Tiny Tim warned us.
You can’t just leave solving these problems to Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, God bless ‘em.
One thing I know is I’m a pig. I have a snout and I can’t change my spots. (Take that, clear and coherent metaphor master!) I have shelves full of important social treatises that I fully intend to read someday. Just not right now. Maybe after I finish this wonderful book about Victorian photography and this one about seventeenth century Dutch landscape painting and this one about Cowpunk Mamas and this one about medieval grail quests and then finish my own new work of literary criticism: Charles the Rooster: What Did He Really Have To Crow About? Then I’ll be ready to think strategy and really help solve the world’s problems. If only it didn’t sound so tedious.
I figure God made us who we are and He wants us to BE fully who we are, as long as we’re on the side of light. Let the ranters rant, the lovers love, the thinkers think, the doers do, and the ponderers ponder. Do it with joy and do it as best you can.
But I’m not sure. Maybe I’m fooling myself. I know the Bible experts in my readership can knock holes in that fool's perspective in a second.
What do you think?
Labels: Art Matters, Meaning of Things, Photos by Patrushka, Simple Justice, Willa Cather

17 Comments:
Your theology is spot on, and I invite you to read my recent post on world hunger.
b blessed
russ
We are reminded many times in the New Testament about there being different gifts and the same spirit. While I can hear some grumbling in the distance that the teaching is about spiritual gifts, I would suggest the lesson was also that not everyone is called to be the same. I would also suggest that spiritual gifts are the actual motivators of artistic gifts.
Also, recall, the Apostles were all working guys who were called out to do what Jesus wanted them to do. The indication was, though, that they generally kept their day jobs. They still fished, collected taxes... Paul made and repaired tents while preaching and travelling.
Another thought. Jesus told us that the poor we would have always. I don't think that was to suggest that we ignore them, rather that we put all things, including good works, into the perspective of how does what I do glorify God?
Some are called to be Mother Theresa or Martin Luther King and others are called to be Mozart or Coltrane.
Besides, we don't live inside the gates of Eden.
Amen. We wouldn't know what to do once we got there. Why, we'd all dance and sing and be silly for all eternity. That is, in-between praisinfg our Lord for saving our sorry butts.
Maranatha.
My dear pig! I appreciated your ponderings in this last post. I agree with your theology, wholeheartedly.
Mr. Leghorn, it is the people who call themselves Christians but don't love Jesus that are the hypocrites. Sounds to me like you are right on track.
I had a few thoughts. As I try to live my life as an artist, a creative individual, I also try to live my life as a caring, concerned individual. I don't see these two things as mutually exclusive. To use Ms. Morley as an example, just because she spends her intellectual energy writing mad papers on American literature doesn't mean she wouldn't sponsor a child or buy Fair Trade coffee or do whatever else she could to be a responsible citizen of the Earth. She may not be feeding orphans in Haiti, but she is doing what she is wired to do.
Hmmm. What I am TRYING to say is that an individual can do what they are made to do, and still have a choice about whether they will be a user or a giver. An artist could live opulently, exploiting those around them, or they could live lovingly, sharing with those around them. So could a plumber. Or an airline pilot. Or a relief worker.
Maybe I'm trying to say that what we do isn't as important as how we do it.
I'm not going to write too much here because I can feel a blog forming on the subject. Let me leave you with an enticing preview:
"We spend our days, each one of us, in looking for the secret of life. Well, the secret of life is in art." -Oscar Wilde
Oh, and by the way, I think Paula hit the nail on the head. Sponsor kids, folks, it really makes a difference!
www.worldvision.org.
I always heard it this way.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he sits in a boat and drinks beer.
I'm going to try to write this fast as I should be getting ready for Vacation Bible School instead of writing comments to a blog...
Remember the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25). It's important to note that a talent was a unit of money, not an ability. Still, it seems clear that Jesus is warning against hoarding what God has given, actively preventing growth...
We are to be productive people.
Keep going, all you ponderers and ranters. I sit at your feet with a little Mona Lisa smile on my big pig face. Finally, we're getting somewhere. I'm just not sure where.
Ok, so now we're getting somewhere? I thought we were already there.
I knew we'd break the doldrums eventually. Thanks to your mom-in-law's German cooking, no doubt. Like the original ponderer, Socrates, you lead your students with questions and leave us to scrabble amongst ourselves. Then you sit and do a La Giaconda impression. Just stay away from the hemlock. Maybe some of those extra special pig mushrooms,hmmmmm?
I think, on that note, it calls for an aside to Leonardo. Did you know he could be considered an original cubist? La Giaconda is many paintings in one, showing the lovely lady and her older self in the same image as well as the lush green landscape and the desolate all at once. I know this stuff is probably pretty obvious, but I never cease to enjoy pondering on it.
Sheesh. Now you got me started.
P'Pig questioned whether it's wrong to pursue self-actualization at the top of Maslow's hierarchy of needs when so many in the world still live at the base of the pyramid without even the basics needed for survival.
God gave the ten commandments to people of all skills, occupations, and abilities. Likewise, Jesus's summary of the commandments, "Love God and love your neighbor," is given to us all, from the simplest and poorest of us to the brightest and richest. Sin comes from breaking these commandments, not from trying to be all we can be, not from being productive with what we have been given. We're called to keep these commandments no matter who we are, no matter what our social standing or how we earn our livings.
We don't have poor people in the world because of a shortfall in God's creation. God put enough resources on this earth to sustain us all. We have poverty and hunger because of the sinful hearts of man -- because man fails to love God and to love one another.
We'll never eliminate the inequities and injustices of this world as long as there is sin. Truly, the poor are always with us.
Nevertheless, followers of Christ can't use the inability to solve global problem as an excuse to do nothing. We must be good stewards of what we've been given -- productive, dilligent people. And we must follow Biblical principles and the examples of Christ and the apostles in giving generously to help the helpless and hopeless.
If the pursuit of self-actualization becomes what you worship rather than God, if your obsession is only yourself and you care nothing about anyone else, you're a wretched being despite all that you may have and all you may know.
Hey, has anybody else been by to check out RUSS's site? The first comment of the current series? It's a vegan rant. Actually, not a rant at all but a pretty well-thought out argument for ending world hunger through going vegan. With enough holes in it to drive a Humvee through - but worth reading, IMHO.
Foghorn, you old blowhard, I think you might be interested in it, not because you are pro or anti-meat, but because of the implication about how doing good business as usual is causing death by starvation.
Chronicler, you tend to be the more "conservative" commenter of our trusty tribe - I'd be interested in your perspective as well - Just try not to rake in Saddam Hussein and flag-burning unless you are absolutely compelled to. I'm against both but these sudden shifts and turns make me feel like I'm in that new movie about drift racing in Tokyo.
By the way, now I've stopped kvetching, thanks for your nice words about the blog. I totally agree. What makes a good blog is the readers and "commenters" it attracts. When I get time and an internet connection again, I am going to seek out and invite more guys (unisex term in my patois) like you all to visit the Pigsty.
Speaking of which, this guy Russ is thought-provoking about a subject I've never thought seriously about before, and Russ, if you are` reading this, I hope you come back from time to time.
I just added Russ' blog to my "Blogs I Read" list at the top of the blog. It's called "Preaching Poetic".
By the way, for future reference, if you click on a commenter's underlined blue link (unless he is posting anonymously) you will be taken to the commenter's profile. If he or she has a blog it will be listed there.
I spent three years doing front lines poverty work. I finally threw in the towel. I decided only two things can change it: Religion and Education. All the rest is window dressing. Even the best of social justice programs seem to me to be of little avail until people start choosing to change from the inside out.
I still give to foodbanks and care where I can, but I'm convinced my time is better spent inviting my fellow journeyers to discover God or teaching them Literacy than I ever was trying to lift them out of homelessness by giving them resources that too often just fostered more dependency on an inadequate system.
Hunger comes in many forms....
I'd rather have the emaciated body of St. Mary of Egypt and feed my soul with authentic, nurturing relationships than be one more over-indulged, fat American who feels alienated, lonely and lost, cut off from self, from community, from creator.
That's a hunger I will keep trying to fight, for the sake of my own soul and those around me....
Pondering Pig -- Your conclusion sound a little bit like Christian Hedonism. Have you heard of that concept before?
That link in the last post, from Phil, is really good. It puts a lot of this discussion into precise words.
Post a Comment
<< Home